Roles in the Security Operation Center (SOC)
Dive into the dynamic roles shaping cybersecurity: we unveil the SOC teamwork and expertise essential for safeguarding ICT systems.
Our S.O.S. line:
+49 89 262 025954
Our team of experts is ready to assist your organization in the event of a cyberattack.
detailsPenetration Testing + Security Operations Center Csaba Krasznay todayApril 30, 2024

Confluence vulnerability here, Ivanti vulnerability there, all of this spiced up with some Microsoft attacks here and there, of course all exploited by nation state attackers or minimum ransomware groups. If you read the cybersecurity press carefully, you can’t miss the list of CVEs with a minimum rating of 10 in the weekly scare column. In fact, we at White Hat IT Security can confirm from our Security Operation Center data that there is a new CVE every week that would inconvenience our customers if they were not detected in time by us. But is the situation worse than this time last year? Has the threat landscape changed in 2024? To investigate this, we would like to present some interesting statistics, with the help of CVE Details.
In 2023, the number of identified CVEs broke all previous records, with a total of 29 065 new entries in the database. This record is likely to be broken this year, as the number of CVEs found in 2024 was 11 832 at the time of writing, while in the same period in 2023 there were only 9 163 vulnerabilities on the list. However, looking at the distribution of these, last year at this time the average CVSS score was 7,7, with 1 692 with a CVSS rating of more than 9. So far this year the average is only 5,9 and the highest category has 1 211 records. Of course this is not reassuring, but fortunately only 27 of this year’s hits have known exploits, while in 2023 a total of 144 vulnerabilities have been written by researchers, professionals or cybercriminals. In the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogue, all exploits known this year are currently in an actively exploited status.
Perhaps all cybersecurity experts would agree that there is no perfectly secure system, it is just a matter of time and will when a software vulnerability is found. Yet it is interesting to note that among the actively exploited flaws, there are a striking number of products that are perimeter security or network security solutions or software packages that support development processes. If we compare this with the attack trends, the choice is not a coincidence. Indeed, access to software developers provides an opportunity to both extensively assess their customer relationships, including bug reports from individual users, and to build backdoors into the software in a stealth operation that can be exploited by attackers at the end-user level. Attacking supply chains in this way therefore makes the software industry particularly vulnerable to attackers, and as there is no direct compliance requirement to meet, this trend will not change until it is recognised that cyber security is also important in this segment, especially if the attacker’s objective is not a covert operation but the introduction of a common ransomware virus.
The case of network security solution vendors is a little different. The customer would have a right to expect a security product to be secure. All too often, however, it turns out that many companies have not done their due diligence in developing their solutions and use software components that are a decade out of date, trusting that a closed operating environment will provide sufficient security. However, it is precisely these solutions that attackers tend to target, since a network device is typically a bottleneck whose availability is critical, so targeting it with distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks guarantees success, and valuable information is passed through such devices that can be useful to the attacker. Not to mention that by spoofing perimeter security systems, it is possible to gain access to an organisation’s internal network, eliminating the need to carry out more spectacular attacks on end users.
Therefore, in some ways the situation is worse than this time last year, but in other ways it seems manageable. What is certain is that the security of software development is becoming more critical, and the leaders of the victimised vendors are making loud commitments to ensure that security is now implemented in their products. But in addition, everyone who uses software or network devices – and who doesn’t? – should be prepared for a critical vulnerability that is sure to show up in their system. Our Security Operation Center is tasked with identifying and addressing incidents as they develop, but with ongoing vulnerability testing, these incidents don’t necessarily have to happen. Security should be provided 24/7/365. We can solve it.
Written by: Csaba Krasznay
Tagged as: cybercriminals, exploit, security software, SOC, vulnerability.
Security Operations Center Csaba Krasznay / February 29, 2024
Dive into the dynamic roles shaping cybersecurity: we unveil the SOC teamwork and expertise essential for safeguarding ICT systems.
Penetration Testing WhiteHat / August 28, 2026
This week’s CVE of the Week is CVE-2026-24301, also known as CoSnitch, an exfiltration method in Microsoft Copilot that could allow an unauthorized attacker to steal sensitive information and data. With a CVSS score of 8.8, deserves serious attention. It is a combination of three different vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to pull data ...
Penetration Testing WhiteHat / August 21, 2026
AI has been a hotspot for everything recently and that’s true for attacks too proven by the recently discovered and also exploited IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0) vulnerability CVE-2026-9198, our #CVEoftheWeek. The issue was addressed in the release of version 1.10.1 on 24th June, which contained many security updates, but known Proof-of-Concepts (PoC) ...